• Thesis Index
  • Research questions
  • Theory
  • Methodology
  • Literature review
  • About

contact@cpd.us

logo
  • Home
  • Blog
  • ePortfolio
  • LMS Hub
  • Demo: Courses
  • My Account

  • Home
  • Blog
  • ePortfolio
  • LMS Hub
  • Demo: Courses
  • My Account
logo
  • Home
  • Blog
  • ePortfolio
  • LMS Hub
  • Demo: Courses
  • My Account

  • Home
  • Blog
  • ePortfolio
  • LMS Hub
  • Demo: Courses
  • My Account
2017-02-08 by Vjeko Health & Medicine, Learning modalities, Promo, Uncategorized 0 comments

Data analysis

Data analysis will rely on three segments (Figure 5):

  1. Phenomenographic research will draw a picture of how QIE/IPL is perceived. My goal is to make the process as collaborative, iterative and transparent as possible/approved. Therefore, in addition to the standard phenomenographic method illustrated below, to evaluate the findings I will 1) organize a follow-up interview with selected participants and 2) share findings with a few leaders and the public (if approved) and ask for feedback. If there are moderate differences between groups, I will reflect on them. If those differences are significant, it may be possible to create separate outcome spaces for each group.
  2. A case study of each professional organization involved in the research will be focused on QIE/IPL-related practices and technology, and the official policy used in the organization. That can help us better interpret data from phenomenographic research and get insight into what is possible in reality. For example, in my most recent research (Hlede, 2015) I found that in the ASA all research participants indicated that IPL is the preferred way to go. However, the official policy of the organization doesn’t reflect that.
  3. Interaction between groups and existing and potential QIE/IPL projects will be analyzed through activity theory, so we can get a better picture of interprofessional activities that at this moment shape perceptions of each profession.

Figure 5. Data analysis.

Reference

Hlede, V. (2015). Interprofessional Learning: Anesthesiologists’ Perspectives. Assignment, Doctoral Programme in E-Research and Technology Enhanced Learning. Department of Educational Research. Lancaster University.

Learning Learning modalities
0

Related Posts

Literature review: CME/CPD of anesthesia team in the U.S.

2017-06-10
Read More

Dr. McMahon encourages innovation and experimentation in CME

2017-04-25
Read More

Literature Review – Key Points

2017-06-10
Read More

Leave a Comment! Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.
Research questionsPrevious Post
Theoretical frameworkNext Post

Recent Posts

  • The lack of health insurance and human casualties: is the number large enough to justify benchmarking against war casualties?
    The lack of health insurance and human casualties: is the number large enough to justify benchmarking against war casualties?
    2017-07-17
  • Moodle Project Inspire – transparent next-generation learning analytics
    Moodle Project Inspire – transparent next-generation learning analytics
    2017-07-15
  • Limitations and Weaknesses of Research Design
    Limitations and Weaknesses of Research Design
    2017-06-17
  • Ethics and Risk
    Ethics and Risk
    2017-06-17
  • Data Analysis
    Data Analysis
    2017-06-17
  • Interviews
    Interviews
    2017-06-17
  • Methodology
    Methodology
    2017-06-17
  • Literature review: Conclusions
    2017-06-11
  • Literature review: Theories behind IPL and QIE
    Literature review: Theories behind IPL and QIE
    2017-06-11

Recent Comments

    Archives

    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017

    Categories

    • CPD Research
    • Health & Medicine
    • Healthcare reform
    • Interprofessional learning
    • Learning modalities
    • Learning system
    • Literature review
    • Methodology
    • Promo
    • QI Laboratory
    • Resources
    • Theory
    • Uncategorized

    Tags

    ACCME Blog content Diplomates index Learning Learning analytics Learning modalities Learning system literature review methodology moodle Project Inspire QI Research

    Calendar

    February 2017
    MTWTFSS
      Mar »
     12345
    6789101112
    13141516171819
    20212223242526
    2728 

    CPD.US

    Location:
    Schaumburg, Illinois, USA

    Email:
    contact@CPD.us

    Explore

    • My.CPD ePortfolio
    • Moodle LMS
    • My old LMS community hub mockup (2010)
    • WordPress LMS

    Research

    • Why this topic?
    • Interviews
    • Indicative thesis contents
    • Data analysis
    • Ethics and risk

    CiviCRM

    • Member directory (test/demo)
    • Member map (test/demo)
    • Member list (demo)
    • Demo contribution page

    Terms of Use        Privacy Policy         Contact Us© 2017 CPD.us. All rights reserved.